The DSM Is Changing Again: Here’s What Private Practice Clinicians Should Do Now

I was checking my email today and noticed a Sana Network listserv email from a member sharing a new APA subcommittee report proposing the biggest structural change to the DSM since 1980. My first reaction was dread. I’ve lived through the DSM-IV to DSM-5 transition early in my career and remembered the scramble, new codes, new templates, insurance panels asking questions, months of double-checking her documentation. Do we all need to brace for another disruptive overhaul landing on our desk with a deadline attached. Then I actually read the report. What I found wasn’t a mandate. It was a proposal, years from any implementation, built specifically to avoid the kind of jarring overhaul I remembered. That distinction matters, and it’s worth fifteen minutes of any practice owner’s attention now, not because anything changes tomorrow, but because it signals where documentation and diagnosis are heading over the next several years.

What the Subcommittee Actually Proposed

In May 2026, the American Journal of Psychiatry published a report from APA’s Structure and Dimensions Subcommittee, part of a broader Future DSM Strategic Committee formed in 2024. Rather than proposing a single new edition, the subcommittee sketched a four-part model for how future diagnoses could be documented: contextual factors like socioeconomic circumstances, developmental history, and functioning; biomarkers and biological factors, included in DSM for the first time; diagnoses themselves, recorded at whatever level of specificity the available information supports; and transdiagnostic features, like anxiety or cognitive difficulty, that cut across categories. Just as significant as the model itself is the process behind it. The subcommittee is explicitly proposing a “continuous improvement” approach, smaller, rolling updates as evidence accumulates, rather than one disruptive overhaul every decade or two. ICD billing crosswalks stay intact throughout. The authors are equally clear that the model is unfinished and open for field feedback.

Why This Is Worth Your Attention as a Practice Owner

The instinct to file this under “someone else’s problem, someday” is understandable, but there’s a real opportunity hiding in the details. The proposed model formalizes things many well-run practices already do informally: tracking a client’s functioning, quality of life, and social context alongside the diagnostic label, rather than reducing a person to a single code. If your intake and progress-note templates already capture that fuller picture, you’re closer to ready than you think. If they don’t, this is useful advance notice to start building documentation habits that will hold up regardless of exactly how or when APA finalizes anything. There’s also a positioning angle here. Practices that talk openly with clients and referral partners about seeing the whole person — context, functioning, and history, not just a diagnostic label, are describing exactly the direction the field’s own governing body says diagnosis is heading. That’s a message worth leaning into now, independent of any formal DSM timeline.

The Practical Case for Getting Ahead of This

Nothing here requires action by next week, and nothing in the report is final. But documentation habits are slow to change, and practices that wait until a new edition lands to adjust their templates are always the ones scrambling. Building flexibility into your intake and progress notes now, capturing severity, functioning, and context as discrete, trackable fields rather than only narrative prose, costs little today and protects you from a rushed retrofit later, whatever the eventual timeline turns out to be. It also means your EHR data will already be structured the way future billing and outcomes reporting are likely to expect, which matters more every year as payers lean harder on functional and outcome data, not just diagnostic codes.

Your Action Plan: 6 Steps to Stay Ahead of the Curve

You have time here, which is exactly why it’s the right moment to build good habits rather than wait for a deadline that forces rushed ones.

1. Treat this as a watch item, not a fire drill. Nothing in the proposal is being implemented soon, and the authors say so explicitly. There’s no coding change to make today, only awareness worth having.
2. Audit whether your current notes already capture context and functioning. Look at a handful of recent charts. If social context, developmental history, and functional impairment are only ever buried in narrative paragraphs, you’re more exposed to future retrofitting than a practice tracking them as discrete fields.
3. Ask your EHR vendor about structured fields for severity and functioning. Many platforms already support this. Turning it on now costs an afternoon and gives you cleaner data regardless of what DSM ultimately does.
4. Keep your ICD-code fluency current. The proposal explicitly preserves the ICD crosswalk for billing purposes, so this remains the stable throughline no matter how the DSM structure evolves around it.
5. Update your marketing language to reflect whole-person, context-aware care. If that’s genuinely how you already practice, say so plainly in your bio and website copy. It’s an accurate description of where the field’s own leadership says diagnosis is headed, not a stretch.
6. Watch for APA’s public comment window and consider weighing in. The subcommittee explicitly invites practitioner feedback. If you have opinions on what’s clinically useful in day-to-day practice, this is a rare chance to shape the outcome rather than just receive it later.

The Bottom Line

This proposal is early, unfinished, and years from mattering to your billing codes. But the direction is clear enough to act on now: documentation that captures the whole person, not just a checklist diagnosis, is where the field is heading and where well-run practices already tend to live. Build that habit at your own pace, and you’ll never have to scramble when the paperwork eventually catches up to the practice you’re already running.

Photo by Olga Tutunaru on Unsplash

Ready to grow your practice and connect with like-minded clinicians?

Sign up for free and connect with other clinicians in your city: sananetwork.com/join

Written by AI & Reviewed by Clinical Psychologist: Yoendry Torres, Psy.D.

Disclaimer: Some blog posts may contain affiliate links, earning Sana Network a commission at no additional cost to you. These recommendations reflect our honest opinions about products or services we find helpful and trustworthy. This content is informational and not legal nor medical advice; consult an attorney or healthcare provider for personalized guidance.

Yoendry Torres